Information
about the combatants
There
are three sets of actors in Colombia's longstanding conflict:
leftist guerrilla groups, right-wing paramilitary groups, and
government security forces. While guerrillas and paramilitaries
do not appear to have a significant support base, most are well-funded
and control significant amounts of territory. All combatants commit
serious abuses of human rights and international humanitarian
law.
| A.
Revolutionary
Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC) |
 |
| Seven-member
Secretariat:
Leader
(above): Pedro Antonio Marín, alias Manuel Marulanda
Vélez or "Tirofijo" (Sureshot), Alfonso
Cano, Raúl Reyes, Timoleón Jiménez,
Iván Márquez, Jorge Briceño (a.k.a.
"Mono Jojoy"), Efraín Guzmán |
What
today is the hemisphere's largest guerrilla group began after
a U.S.-supported attack on a Communist Party-inspired peasant
cooperative in southern Tolima department calling itself the "independent
republic of Marquetalia." According to the guerrilla group's
version of events, the May 1964 raid pitted 16,000 military personnel
against a community of 1,000, of which forty-eight were armed.
Survivors
of the Marquetalia raid founded the FARC shortly afterward, led
by Manuel Marulanda, a peasant guerrilla who had fought since
1948 in a period of partisan bloodletting known as La Violencia.
Still
headed by the septuagenarian Marulanda, the FARC now has about
18,000 members in almost 70 fronts, organized in regional "blocs,"
plus mobile columns and urban militias. The group controls or
operates freely in 40 to 60 percent of country, usually sparsely
populated areas, rural zones, jungles and plains, and rarely in
significant population centers. Its principal strongholds are
east and south of the Andes.
While
it received limited assistance from the Soviet bloc during the
Cold War, today the FARC finances itself through kidnapping for
ransom, extortion, and involvement in Colombia's drug trade. Together
with the ELN (described below), the FARC is responsible for the
majority of kidnappings committed in Colombia. Over fifty of those
in FARC custody are officials (Colombian legislators, governors,
ex-presidential candidate Íngrid Betancourt, and three
U.S. citizens working for a Defense Department contractor) the
group has held for years, insisting on exchanging them for FARC
prisoners in Colombian jails.
The
FARC and ELN are responsible for about 20 percent of killings
associated with Colombia's conflict, many of them civilian non-combatants.
The FARC carries out occasional massacres, and has claimed many
innocent lives through indiscriminate use of inaccurate gas-cylinder
bombs. The FARC regularly recruits minors, at times by force.
Much
of Colombia's coca is grown in FARC-controlled areas, and the
guerrillas' link to the drug trade is the source of much controversy.
While this link is chiefly "taxation" of coca-growers
in the areas it controls, the group has some involvement in drug
production and transit, though the paramilitaries likely control
a far greater share of these latter phases of the narcotrafficking
chain.
The
Colombian Armed Forces estimate that the FARC gets about half
its income from involvement in narcotics trafficking, an amount
that is probably between $200 million and $400 million per year
(estimates range from $100 million to $1 billion).
Aided
in part by this income source, the FARC grew rapidly during the
1990s, and dealt the Colombian military several humiliating defeats
in 1996-1998. It has since lost some momentum, losing key battles
to the army and some territory to paramilitaries.
The
FARC was involved in unsuccesful attempts to negotiate peace in
1984-87, 1991, 1992 and 1998-2002. During the first peace process
-- which even brought a cease-fire -- the FARC set up a political
party, the Patriotic Union, which the group had hoped to use as
a vehicle for an eventual entry into non-violent political participation.
Between the Patriotic Union's founding in 1985 and the early 1990s,
at least 2,000 of the party's congress members, mayors, candidates
and activists were killed by paramilitaries, security forces,
and drug cartels. The slaughter of the Patriotic Union left the
FARC's military structure intact, but left the group with few
articulate political spokespeople.
Zone
of FARC activity
FARC
peace talks page
| B.
National Liberation Army (ELN) |
 |
| Five-member
"central command" (COCE):
Leader
(above):
Nicolás
Rodríguez, also known as "Gabino," Antonio García,
Pablo Beltrán, Ramiro Vargas, Oscar Santos |
The
ELN was founded in 1964 by a group of Colombian students who underwent
training in Cuba. The group launched its first military operations
in Colombia's north-central Magdalena Medio region the following
year. Attempting to follow the Cuban model of rural rebellion,
the ELN grew slowly but attracted many radical students and priests.
Among the priests were Camilo Torres, a firebrand who died during
his first combat in 1966, and two Spaniards, Domingo Laín
and Manuel Pérez. Pérez served as the group's maximum
leader from the 1970s until his death of natural causes in 1998.
Today,
ELN membership is estimated at about 3,500 members, down from
a late-1990s high of about 5,000. The group, which does not profit
significantly from the drug trade, has lost ground to paramilitary
groups.
The
ELN relies more heavily on kidnapping and extortion to support
itself. It frequently targets Colombia's oil sector, which it
regards as dominated by foreign interests. Bombings of pipelines
and energy infrastructure (such as power lines) are frequent.
The group has also carried out several high-profile mass kidnappings
since 1999.
The
ELN was involved in brief peace talks with the government in 1991
and 1992, participating together with the FARC in a now-defunct
structure called the "Simón Bolívar Guerrilla
Coordination." The group held sporadic talks with the Colombian
government between 1998 and 2002, and has maintained contacts
with the Uribe government via the Mexican government since 2003.
For
years, the ELN has declared its intention to negotiate its peace
agenda through a several-month "convention" with Colombia's
civil-society and popular groups.
Zone
of ELN activity
ELN
peace talks page
| C.
Smaller guerrilla groups |
Colombia
has at least three other, far smaller insurgent groups. The Popular
Liberation Army (EPL) is a remnant that refused to go along when
the original EPL, a Maoist-inspired group, negotiated a peace
accord with the government in 1991. Perhaps a few dozen members
remain; the group's leader, Francisco Caraballo, is in prison.
The ERG (Guevarist Revolutionary Army) and ERP (Popular Revolutionary
Army), tiny groups that are essentially satellites of the FARC
and ELN, carry out occasional kidnappings and terrorist attacks.
| United
Self-Defense Groups of Colombia (AUC) |
| 
Paramilitary
leaders Iván Roberto Duque (Central Bolívar
Bloc), Salvatore Mancuso (Northern Bloc, AUC military
chief), and Ramón Isaza (Middle Magdalena
Bloc) address the Colombian congress, July 2004. |
 |
| |
Colombia
has a long history of privately financed self-defense groups,
usually suffused with their wealthy patrons' right-wing beliefs.
These groups' numbers began to grow rapidly in the 1980s.
The growth coincided with the advent of Colombia's drug trade.
Newly wealthy drug traffickers laundered their profits by buying
up as much as 2.5 million acres of land in northern Colombia during
the 1980s. These new landholders put together private armies to
deal with the guerrillas who kidnapped and extorted wealthy ranchers
in the area. One of the first, and most feared, was a group calling
itself "Death to Kidnappers" (Muerte a Secuestradores,
or MAS), active in the Magdalena Medio region of north-central
Colombia.
With funding from drug traffickers and other large landholders,
and close and open collaboration with Colombia's armed forces,
the paramilitaries gained strength throughout the 1980s. Their
tactics -- selective assassinations and forced disappearances,
massacres, forced displacement of entire populations -- quickly
made them one of the country's main human rights abusers. They
also played a strong role in the decimation of the Patriotic Union
political party (see FARC section above).
The abuses of groups like MAS caused paramilitaries to be declared
illegal in 1989. Little was done to disband them, though. Human
rights groups have documented widespread post-1989 collaboration
between Colombia's armed forces and paramilitary groups.
In the early 1990s the United Self-Defense Forces of Córdoba
and Urabá (ACCU), a group headed by brothers Carlos and
Fidel Castaño, emerged in northwestern Colombia. Using
extreme brutality toward civilian populations, the group grew
to be a powerful player in the northern regions of Colombia. Fidel
Castaño was probably killed by guerrillas in 1995.
By 1997, Carlos Castaño had organized the ACCU and several
other paramilitary groups throughout the country into a national
structure, the United Self-Defense Groups of Colombia (AUC). The
group grew rapidly, from perhaps 4,000 members in 1998 to a reported
13,000 in 2002. By the time its last declared members demobilized
in 2006, however, their number had reached about 32,000.
The AUC was always more of a loose, fluid confederation than a
unified structure. The AUC even dissolved momentarily in 2002,
when Carlos Castaño briefly resigned from the AUC's leadership
because "everyone does as he wishes." Divisions within
the group over links to the drug trade worsened during the early
2000s, exacerbated by the U.S. Justice Department's requests to
extradite AUC leaders for narcotrafficking and the State Department's
inclusion of the AUC on its list of international terrorist groups.
At the same time, a new wave of individuals with long histories
as narcotraffickers began entering the group's top leadership.
Leaders like Diego Fernando Murillo ("Don Berna"), Víctor
Manuel Mejía ("El Mellizo") and Francisco Javier
Zuluaga ("Gordolindo") moved from Colombia's drug underworld
to command of key paramilitary blocs.
After several years of divisions, including increasing incidents
of combat between groups (particularly in Magdalena and Casanare),
the AUC became more adequately represented by blocs than by one
singular banner. 2004 saw the murder of several prominent paramilitary
leaders at the hands of fellow paramilitaries: Carlos Castaño
in April, "Rodrigo 00" of the now-defunct Metro Bloc
in June, and Miguel Arroyave of the Centauros Bloc in September.
After Carlos Castaño, the most publicly recognized leader
of the AUC was Salvatore Mancuso. A former Córdoba rancher,
Mancuso became the "Maximum Comandante" of the AUC and
chief negotiator in Santa Fe de Ralito. Mancuso was the first
top AUC leader to testify under the Justice and Peace Law.
Key Blocs
The Northern Bloc -
Run by AUC military leader Salvatore Mancuso, the Northern Bloc
incorporated Fidel and Carlos Castaño's original ACCU,
controlling municipalities in a swath of territory stretching
from the Panamanian to the Venezuelan borders. Mancuso's deputy
in the Caribbean coast was Rodrigo Tovar Pupo, more commonly known
as Jorge 40, whom authorities believe controlled much of Colombia's
Caribbean drug routes. Vicente Castaño, Carlos and Fidel's
brother, is a third powerful player - and he is widely believed
to have played a role in Carlos' death. The Northern Bloc demobilized
in March of 2006. Vicente Castaño is a fugitive from justice.
The "Élmer Cárdenas Bloc" -
Led by José Alfredo "El Alemán" Berrío,
the Elmer Cardenas Bloc was originally part of the ACCU, which
through a wave of brutality and massacres gained control of the
strategic Urabá region near the Colombian-Panamanian border
during the 1990s. Substantial evidence suggests that Berrío
and the Élmer Cárdenas Bloc are very strong in drug
trafficking. This bloc barely participated in peace talks and
was one of the last to demobilize.
The Catatumbo Bloc –
This unit, an offshoot of the Northern Bloc, operated in the conflictive,
drug-producing region of Catatumbo, in Norte de Santander department
near the Venezuelan border. Commanded by Salvatore Mancuso –
who also dominated paramilitary activity in Córdoba department
and elsewhere in northwestern Colombia – it demobilized
in late 2004.
The Magdalena Medio Bloc -
Led by Ramón "El Viejo" Isaza on the west side
of the Magdalena river, one of the the most veteran paramilitaries,
and Victor Triana "Botalón" Arias on the other
side of the river. The Magdalena Medio Bloc demobilized on February
7, 2006.
The Central Bolivar Bloc -
Deeply involved in Colombia's drug trade, the BCB rivaled (and
perhaps exceeded) the Northern Bloc in size and wealth. Led by
Iván Roberto "Ernesto Baez" Duque and Carlos
Mario Jimenez (“Macaco”) the BCB controlled much of
the greater Magdalena Medio region and significant portions of
southern Colombia's coca-growing regions. The BCB, along with
the Northern Bloc, was one of the first to enter into negotiations
with the Colombian Government and officially demobilized on January
31, 2006.
The "Mineros" Bloc -
Though it controlled a small area in northeast Antioquia, the
Mineros Bloc was quite wealthy, largely from narcotrafficking.
It was led by Ramiro "Cuco" Vanoy, wanted by the United
States for his participation in the North Valle drug cartel. The
“Mineros” Bloc demobilized in January of 2006.
The Calima Bloc -
Situated in and around Cali and down the Pacific coast to northern
Cuaca, and led by Hernán Hernández, this bloc formed
in 1999 after the ELN staged a kidnapping in a church in a wealthy
Cali neighborhood. Heavily dependent on drug traffickers' support,
the bloc demobilized in December 2004.
The
"Avengers of Arauca" Bloc -
Commanded,
at least on paper, by Pablo Mejia ("El Mellizo"), a
Northern Valle Cartel figure wanted by the United States, this
bloc operated in an oil producing region that has been a principal
destination of U.S. military assistance. The Bloc demobilized
on December 23, 2005.
The
"Libertadores del Sur" Bloc -
Operated in the coca-growing zones of Nariño and Putumayo
and led by Guillermo Pérez Alzate ("Pablo Sevillano"),
a noted narcotrafficker wanted by U.S. authorities. The Bloc demobilized
on July 30, 2005.
The
"Centauros Bloc" -
Operating
in oil-rich Casanare, Meta, Cundinamarca and Bogotá's slums,
this bloc had been disintegrating following the murder of its
leader, Miguel Arroyave, at the hands of his own men in September
2004. The Centauros fought a bloody campaign against the Llanos
Bloc in Casanare. It demobilized on September 3, 2005.
The
Llanos Bloc -
Headed
by "Martín Llanos," based in Casanare, this bloc
has been nearly decimated by repeated attacks from the rest of
the AUC (especially the Centauros Bloc) and the Colombian military.
Regardless, it never participated in peace talks and remnants
are still operating.
These
bloc-by-bloc demobilizations happened against the backdrop of
peace talks with the government of Álvaro Uribe, which
began in December 2002. In July 2003, the Uribe government and
the AUC agreed to a process of demobilization which would end
in August of 2006. Over the next three years, close to 32,000
paramilitaries turned over their arms.
During
these negotiations, paramilitaries and NGOs waged a legislative
battle to settle the terms of demobilization. Paramilitaries and
the government conflicted over roadblocks such as impunity for
crimes against humanity, U.S. extradition requests, and drug-trade
infiltration. After several rounds of lenient legislation, Colombia’s
Congress passed the Justice and Peace Law in June 2005. Many human
rights activists saw this law as a concession to the paramilitaries,
allowing light jail sentences and giving the government few tools
with which to dismantle paramilitary power. In 2006, though, Colombia’s
Constitutional Court revised the law. Now, ex-paramilitaries must
confess their crimes, reveal information about their networks,
and return illegal assets or face losing their privileged treatment
for demobilizing.
Today,
about fifty top paramilitary leaders are in a maximum-security
prison; they and about 2,300 other are awaiting processing under
the “Justice and Peace” law. (The other approximately
30,000 ex-paramilitaries were exonerated, due to a lack of evidence
that they participated in large-scale “crimes against humanity.”)
Though
the demobilization process is often heralded as a success, there
remain significant concerns about its effectiveness. Paramilitary
violence, though less prevalent, is still very present Colombia.
The ninth OAS/MAPP report notes that in the rural areas most affected
by violence in the past, citizens have not experienced substantial
improvement in the security situation.[3]
Not all Colombian paramilitary blocs demobilized or even participated
in the peace talks. In the Meta Department, for example, groups
reorganized under mid-level commanders continue to battle over
drug trafficking lanes with the influence of leaders like Vicente
Castaño and Hernán Hernández (though Hernández
was captured by the government in April 2007).[1][3]
This
example highlights one of the most serious roadblocks facing the
demobilization process. Many “demobilized” groups
and leaders are likely to be continuing their activities. In May
2007, the newspaper Semana released recorded cell phone conversations
in which jailed paramilitary leaders going through the Justice
and Peace process continued to manage drug sales, extortion, tortures,
murders, and cover-ups from their prison cells.[2]
Other
concerns center on the extent to which paramilitary power is truly
being dismantled. The unfolding “parapolitics” scandal,
which has implicated several of President Uribe’s supporters
in the Congress and local government, has raised questions about
the groups’ penetration of the state.
Some
demobilizing paramilitary leaders have revealed disturbing information
about their traditionally close relations with the military and
local political elites. However, most of the testimonies top ex-AUC
leaders have given in mid-2007 have revealed next to nothing about
past crimes or paramilitary networks.
Meanwhile,
evidence suggests that new illegal armed groups are emerging to
fill the AUC’s place in the drug trade. These new groups,
which are virtually indistinguishable from drug gangs, lack the
ideology and organization of the AUC, even conducting business
with guerrilla armies.[3][1]
As the government has attacked and captured members, it is discovering
that only a minority are remobilized AUC. Most combatants are
new recruits.[1]
Zone
of AUC activity
Zone
of Paramilitary presence over time
Though
Colombia has avoided most Latin American countries' histories
of chronic military coups, its armed forces operate with considerable
autonomy and often challenge civilian leaders. Over the years,
Colombia's security forces, especially its Army, have suffered
from a reputation for corruption, human rights abuse and poor
performance on the battlefield.
The
military has nonetheless maintained very close relations with
the United States at least since the early cold war (Colombia
even sent a battalion to Korea in 1950). This collaboration has
intensified since 1999, when the bulk of US counter-drug aid shifted
from the National Police to the Army.
Colombia's
Defense Ministry, headed by a civilian since the 1991 Constitution
was ratified, includes the Army (about 180,000 members), Police
(about 150,000), Air Force (about 10,000) and Navy (about 5,000).
Colombian
law exempts anyone with a high-school education from serving in
combat units. With a large contingent of these "bachilleres"
and many soldiers guarding oil installations and infrastructure,
perhaps half of the Army -- maybe less -- is available to fight
illegal armed groups. The Colombian government has announced its
intention to reduce the number of "bachilleres" and
add professional volunteer soldiers.
The
armed forces have improved their battlefield performance since
suffering embarrasing defeats at the hands of the FARC in 1996-98.
In 2000 and 2001 the Army won decisive battles in Sumapaz, a zone
50 miles south of Bogotá, in Santander department ("Operation
Berlín"), and in Vichada and Guanía departments
("Operation Black Cat"). Offensives carried out by the
Uribe government have generally been successful. Maintaining control
over re-conquered territories, however, remains a challenge, since
investment in civilian governance is scarce.
Though
their share of direct involvement in killings and disappearances
has fallen in recent years to a current level of about 5-7 percent,
the armed forces nonetheless continue to face serious allegations
of indirect human rights abuse through collaboration with paramilitary
groups. Except for a few high-profile cases, past abusers continue
to enjoy near-complete impunity. [See the reports linked from
the human rights section of this site's "Links"
page.]
Location
of military units
Colombian
government home page
Sources:
1International
Crisis Group, "Colombia's New Armed Groups," Latin America
Report Number 20, 10 May 2007. <http://www.crisisgroup.org/home/index.cfm?id=4824&l=1>
2"Te
llamo desde la prisión," Semana, 12 May 2007.
<http://www.semana.com/wf_InfoArticulo.aspx?idArt=103556>
8Organization
of American States, "Ninth quarterly report of the Secretary
General to the Permanent Council, on the Mission to Support the
Peace Process in Colombia (OAS/MAPP)," 3 July 2007.