Press Room

Obama Goes "Bold" in a New Approach to Cuba Policy


Today, President Obama made a historic shift in U.S. relations to Cuba, moving to end policies that have failed the citizens of Cuba and the United States for over 50 years... Read More »

Elizabeth Newhouse to Direct Center for International Policy's Cuba Project


Elizabeth Newhouse has been named the director of the Center for International Policy’s Cuba Project. Wayne Smith, who has headed the project since its inception in 1991, will continue to be involved with the project as a senior fellow... Read More »

New Resource has Interactive Data of U.S. Security Assistance Worldwide


The Center for International Policy launched the Security Assistance Monitor, a new program and web-resource that tracks U.S. military and police assistance and arms sales worldwide... Read More »

CIA Chief Is a Defender with Influence

Melvin A. Goodman quoted


John Brennan was remembered by colleagues at the CIA as "moving in the direction of power and not being able to exercise any independence... Read More »

Drugs, Murder and Corruption in Mexico

Laura Carlsen quoted


The disappearance of the 43 Mexican students from police custody in September raised many questions about the connections between the state and drug cartels... Read More »

In Absence of Public Debate, Kerry Vows to Wage War 'As Long As It Takes'

Stephen Miles quoted


Analysts warn 'there is no military solution to the problems caused by ISIS... Read More »

Veterans, America’s Wars & A Long Way To Go

Matthew Hoh interviewed


Hoh discusses war, the Middle East, veteran suicides, resistance, and the paradoxes of our (Western) governments... Read More »

The First U.S. Official to Resign Over Afghanistan Is Fighting to Help Whistleblowers

Matthew Hoh interviewed


In an interview with Vice News, Hoh explains how he had lost confidence in the tactics being used in the conflict in Afghanistan, and that he had no idea why it was going on... Read More »

Hagel's Resignation Prompts Fear Over Obama's Military Intentions

Matthew Hoh interviewed


Chuck Hagel’s disagreement with Obama’s position on the Iraq, Syria and Afghanistan wars is most likely behind his resignation... Read More »

The Economic and Security Future

11-17-14 | Hyatt Regency Capitol Hill, Washington DC

Economists for Peace and Security works to promote non-military solutions to world challenges, and more broadly to work towards freedom from fear and want for all. Join them for a discussion of the economic and security future... Read More »

Financial Transparency Coalition Annual Conference 2014

10-14-14 | Lima, Peru

Mark your calendars for the Financial Transparency Coalition 2014 annual conference co-hosted by the Latin American Network on Debt and Development in Lima, Peru October 14-15... Read More »

Hill Briefing

09-16-14 | Dirksen Senate Office Building, Room G-11

With the President’s announcement of a $5 billion Counter Terrorism Partnerships Fund in late May, the Obama administration is greatly expanding U.S. foreign security assistance to combat terrorism around the world. Join us for a discussion of the challenges and opportunities created by this announcement... Read More »

Sign Up for CIP’s Press List

Media Only:
Sign up below to automatically be added to our press list. Please select the specific programs and regions for which you are interested in receiving information. If you would like to receive our bi-weekly e-newsletter, the CIP Update, please check the box below. Non-media, please subscribe to our email list here.

Rapid Reactions
from Our Experts
  • House Passage of McGovern-Jones-Lee Iraq Resolution

    Response by Stephen Miles


    Today the House of Representatives made clear that they stand with the American public, who do not want to go back to war in Iraq. By passing H. Con. Res 105 overwhelmingly, the House also sent a strong message to President Obama that there is no authorization for any escalation of US military involvement in Iraq. 

    The challenges in Iraq are deeply complex and there is simply not a way for America to bomb our way to a solution. While we continue to welcome the President’s opposition to sending combat troops, we remain concerned that over 800 American military personnel are currently in harms way in a nation increasingly embroiled in a violent sectarian conflict. After nearly 13 years of trying to solve such challenges militarily in Iraq and Afghanistan, with little success, the American people simply do not support another war in the Middle East. Instead, we hope today’s clear message against military escalation will encourage the President to double down on diplomatic efforts and a robust humanitarian response.”

  • Extension of Negotiations with Iran

    Response by Stephen Miles


    The interim deal has frozen Iran’s nuclear program and, with this extension, it will stay frozen while our diplomats seal the deal. We are doing today what we should have done in Iraq a decade ago: letting diplomacy work so that we can have inspectors on the ground, not boots on the ground.

    Negotiations between the international community and Iran have already made more progress in six months than a decade of sanctions and the threat of military action. We are pleased to see that negotiators are going to stay at the table and finish the job of peacefully solving one of America’s most pressing national security threats.

    Unfortunately, some of the same voices who once sold our nation to war in Iraq on lies about weapons of mass destruction are at it again. Fortunately, Americans are ready to fight back. In the coming days, it will be up to Congress to chose who to listen to: Dick Cheney and those banging the drums of war, or the American public who want to let diplomacy work.

  • We Oppose Military Intervention in Iraq

    Response by Tom Andrews Stephen Miles Angela Miller


    With Iraq once again descending into violence, we must not repeat the mistakes of the past. No military intervention, whether the massive invasion of 2003 or the limited airstrikes some are calling for today, will solve the deep and complex challenges Iraq is facing. Iraq’s problems can only be solved by Iraqis, not American bombs. Launching another military intervention in Iraq would only throw more fuel on a fire that is raging. Even worse, it would once again risk American lives in a fight that is not ours and that we cannot win.

  • What's the Next Step with Russia?

    Response by Harry Blaney


    It is important that the allies unite around a strategy that will prevent future aggression and make Russia pay for its recent actions. However, it is also important to devise a series of policies that will reach out to Russian citizens and encourage those forces seeking greater freedom and civic participation. This will keep a window open between the East and the West and maintain a dialogue between students and travellers of both regions. A negative strategy itself is inadequate. There must also be another strategy in place that will, over the long-term, draw Russia into the society of democratic nations that seek to resolve shared global challenges in a unified and constructive way. Achieving the balance between punishment and peace will be hard. It is, though, a better way forward than simply punitive actions or no actions at all.

  • Why We Don't Need More Defense Spending

    Response by William Hartung


    NATO Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen claims that the Ukraine crisis “shows us more clearly than ever that defence matters[,]” and that we should reverse the decline in defense spending. While Russia’s military takeover of Crimea is an unacceptable violation of international law, it provides no justification for increasing the Pentagon’s already bloated budget. The idea that more defense spending equals more influence over the behavior of other countries is simply untrue. Vladimir Putin is not huddled in Moscow toting up the figures in the Pentagon's latest budget proposal, and then using it as a guide as to whether to take military action. Nor is any other world leader. They are following their perceived interests and weighing them against the consequences that might result from any given course of action.