Research: Publications

The Border Patrol's Strategic Muddle

December 3, 2012 | Report

By Tom Barry

Download PDF | HTML Version

How the Nation's Border Guardians Got Stuck in a Policy Conundrum, and How They Can Get Out

The U.S. Border Patrol has released a new strategic plan – the third in its nine-decade history. Rather than clarifying the agency’s strategic focus, the new plan underscores the agency’s lack of strategic direction.

The 2012-2016 Border Patrol Strategic Plan comes amid mounting criticism of the billion-dollar high-tech programs, its excessive and cross-border violence, and its continuing failure to provide performance measures and cost-benefit evaluations of its array of new border security initiatives.

Framed as a military-type strategy and replete with references to border risks and threats, the Border Patrol's plan fails to indicate on what grounds risks will be assessed, how threats will be evaluated, and how new spending will be determined. Nowhere can be found even the hint of a commitment to make its border security programs more transparent, accountable, and cost-effective.

The Border Patrol’s Strategic Muddle outlines the agency’s policy conundrum and chronicles how the Border Patrol came to be stuck in its current state.  The report offers common-sense prescriptions for extricating the agency from its "strategic muddle" and for setting new directions for the future.

Please click here for the report's executive summary.

Download PDF | HTML Version

CIP in the Press
  • RSPO Recertifies IOI Group, But NGOs Have Yet to See ‘Real Action on the Ground’

    CIP quoted

    Sustainable Brands, 08-09-16

    Less than five months after the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO) suspended Malaysian palm oil producer IOI Group’s certification, that suspension has been lifted – much to the dismay of NGO campaigners. While the RSPO’s Complaints Panel has said it is “satisfied that IOI has met the conditions set out in its letter to IOI,” Greenpeace Indonesia and the Center for International Policy says they have yet to see any real action on the ground...Read More »

  • Think Tanks and their Corporate Funders: Who’s Selling What?

    Bill Goodfellow quoted

    Nonprofit Quarterly, 08-09-16

    The article concedes that much of Brookings’ work appears unconnected, at least on the surface, to corporate interests. Still, as Bill Goodfellow, the executive director of the Center for International Policy, another think tank, said, “People think of think tanks as do-gooders, uncompromised and not bought like others in the political class. But it’s absurd to suggest that donors don’t have influence. The danger is we in the think tank world are being corrupted in the same way as the political world. And all of us should be worried about it.”—Ruth McCambridge...Read More »

  • Thousands of Pages of Confidential Think Tank Documents Detail Corporate Ties

    Bill Goodfellow quoted

    DESMOG, 08-09-16

    “People think of think tanks as do-gooders, uncompromised and not bought like others in the political class,” Bill Goodfellow, executive director of one think tank, the Center for International Policy, told The New York Times. “The danger is we in the think tank world are being corrupted in the same way as the political world. And all of us should be worried about it.”...Read More »